A family name can be familiar enough to hide a revision. For Pulse 2, retaining the numeral is the first editorial decision: it keeps the entry tied to the manufacturer’s published model rather than to a loose collection of similarly named devices.
A label with a job to do
The complete designation belongs in the headline, caption and source note. Removing the revision makes a record shorter, but also makes it harder to decide which specification or instruction supports a sentence. A neighbouring Pulse file should remain a neighbouring file.
The document and the unit
A manufacturer page is evidence of what the manufacturer publishes. It is not evidence that a particular sample has the same revision, or that every pictured detail appears in every market. Packaging identifiers and an applicable instruction document would help connect those two records.
What the image contributes
The pictured Pulse 2 gives this entry a traceable visual subject. Its display and exterior presentation can be described as manufacturer material. Indicator accuracy, consistency and durability would require an identified unit and a recorded method.
A useful stopping point
This file reaches a documentation conclusion rather than a performance verdict. Keep the revision attached, leave unmatched fields blank and ask for a dated model document before importing a numerical claim. That is a stronger record than a complete-looking table assembled from several variants.
Source note
Manufacturer documentation, consulted 17 October 2026. Numerical specifications are omitted where a dated, market-specific document has not been matched to the record.
Continue through the brand desk or the Claim Compass.